Mukhiya Nut @ Karan Nut @ Karan Nat v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./6207/2026 · 2026-02-03
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32802 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32802 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6207 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2025 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== Mukhiya Nut @ Karan Nut @ Karan Nat S/O Giri Nut R/O Vilage- Kasba Maker Tola, Chakiya, P.S.- Maker, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 247 of 2025, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 96 liters liquor was recovered from the Palani of the petitioner and co- accused person.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6207 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 submitted that the alleged recovery has been made from the joint house (Palani) of the petitioner where other family members also reside. It is next submitted that name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local chaukidar. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, contends that prima-facie, no case is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co- accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 16.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 86863 of 2025. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 247 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6207 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
Rajorshi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T