MADHU LOHRA ALIAS VIDHA BEDA v. THE STATE OF JAHRKHAND
B.A./1143/2026 · 2026-04-02
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3280 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3280 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9337
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1143 of 2026
Madhu Lohar @ Vidha @ Beda, aged about 29 years, S/o – Chota Lohar, Resident of Village – Kehsargaria, P.O. + P.S. – Rajnagar, District – West Singhbhum
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratap Shankar, Advocate
: Mr. Bhaskar Trivedi, Advocate
: Ms. Shipra Sonam, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Advocate
--- 03/02.04.2026
Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2025 in connection with Chaibasa Sadar P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, registered under Section 309(6) of BNS, now pending in the court of learned C.J.M at Chaibasa. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and as per the allegation, the accused persons had looted Rs.5 lacs from the informant and his co- staff, while they were going to deposit the same in Bank of Baroda, Chaibasa branch. He submits that the police have recovered only an amount of Rs.5,500/- from the petitioner along with one mobile and motorcycle. He has submitted that the motorcycle which is alleged to have been used in the commission of offence has not been put under TIP and the petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2025. He has also submitted that a number of accused persons have been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate benches of this Court. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and submitted that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent. 5. In response, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already been enlarged on bail in the said case. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on
2026:JHHC:9337
2
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M at Chaibasa in connection with Chaibasa Sadar P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:02.04.2026 Saurav/- Date of Uploading:03.04.2026