- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010682562024 NC: 2026:KHC:44582 WP No. 31680 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 31680 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S. KARAVALI HOTELS PVT. LTD., NATIONAL HIGHWAY 66, ADI UDUPI - 576 103 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR RAJENDRA S SHETTY, REGISTER UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATARAMANA K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RECOVERY OFFICER -II DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1 4TH FLOOR, BSNL BUILDING, TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJBHAVAN ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 2. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, REGIONAL OFFICE AT MANIPAL CENTRE, BANGALORE-560042 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL CHIEF …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MITHULYA MURALI, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. VIGNESH S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VARADARAJ R HAVALDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010682562024 NC: 2026:KHC:44582 WP No. 31680 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLN, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Venkataramana K.S, counsel for the petitioner, Smt.Mithulya Murali, counsel on behalf Smt.Anuparna Bordoloi, for respondent No.1 and Sri.Vignesh S.Shetty, counsel on behalf of Sri.Varadaraj R.Havaldar, counsel for respondent No.2 appeared in person. 2. This petition is filed seeking following reliefs: (i) Quash the sale proclamation-cum-E-auction sale notice dated 25.10.2024 published in DCP No.7108 in OA No.14/2010 vide Annexure-D by the respondent No.1 as the same is barred by limitation. (ii) Pass such other direction or order or writ as may deem fit to this Hon'ble Court may kindly be issued. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010682562024 NC: 2026:KHC:44582 WP No. 31680 of 2024 3. Counsel for respondent No.2 on instruction submits that the sale notice dated 25.10.2024 has not been given effect to as of today. 4. Taking note of the said submission, nothing survives for consideration. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23