SANDEEP ALIAS SONU v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
CRWP/8710/2026 · 2026-07-22
Shalini Singh Nagpal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32791 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32791 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
REEMA SAINI 2026.07.23 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CRWP No. 8710 of 2026(O&M) -2- accepted nor declined. Vide communication dated 11.07.2026, petitioner had been asked to submit complete medical documents to the office. It is urged that petitioner had supplied all documents available with him and he had no other documents. He further submits that petitioner would be satisfied if respondent No.3 is directed to decide the prayer for emergency parole by an early date.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and places on record custody certificate of petitioner. He submits that the matter was pending before Superintendent Jail, Faridabad-respondent No.3 only for the reason that petitioner did not supply complete medical documents of his mother . In case, no more documents were to be made over, the application would be decided in due course.
5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by counsel for petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3- Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, District Faridabad, to decide the application submitted by the petitioner within a period of 7 days from today, by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 22.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.07.23 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh