1 CGHC010208562019 2026:CGHC:35761 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4828 of 2019 1 - Rajkumar Nag S/o Shri Balram Nag Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Chitalanka Hospital Para Post Teknar Dantewada District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgar, Working As Peon (Class Iv Employee) At Balak Ashram Konta District Sukma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Police Station Rakhi District Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - The Collector Collector Office Police Station Sukuma District Sukma Chhattisgarh., 3 - The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Police Station Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh., 4 - District Education Officer Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh, 5 - Krishna Kumar Tandiya S/o Shri Ramdas Tandiya Government Higher Secondary School Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sukhnath Oyami S/o Dashruram Oyami Government High School Gadiras, District Sukma Chhattisgarh. 7 - Makhsud Khan S/o Late Amanulla Khan Block Development Officer, Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kumar Patel, advocate appears on behalf of Mr. P.K. Tulsyan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 12.08.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for following relief(s):- A. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the petitioner demand. Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2026.08.13 12:09:52 +0530 2 B. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ the commanding respondent authorities to give the promotion's post to the petitioner and also provided the future benefit to him as per his entitlement. C. This Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quashed the promotion list dated 05.01.2019 (Annexure P-4). D. Any other relief as the Hon'ble Court may be deemed fit and proper with cost of petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation (Annexure P/5) before the competent authority seeking his promotion. However, the said representation has not yet been considered and decided. He, therefore, confines his prayer to a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the said representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not oppose the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, respondent No. 2/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P/5) submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the persons who are likely to be materially affected by the decision. The petitioner shall be at liberty to submit an additional representation along with all relevant documents, if so advised. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Jyoti