Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32781 (KAR)

SRI. MOHAN K @ K. MOHAN v. INDIA BULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD

WP/14743/2024 · 2026-08-19

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010300002024 NC: 2026:KHC:44564 WP No. 14743 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 14743 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAN K. @ K. MOHAN, PROPRIETOR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SAI MANJUNATHA ENTERPRISES, R/AT: NO. 344, 8TH 'A' CROSS, TRIVENI ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU - 560 022 2. SMT. H.S. DEEPTHI MOHAN @ DEEPTHI MOHAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O MOHAN K. @ K. MOHAN, R/AT N O. 344, 8TH 'A' CROSS, TRIVENI ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU - 560 022 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.V. KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. LEELADHAR H.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. INDIA BULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, F-60, MALHOTRA BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, CANNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI - 110 001 Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010300002024 NC: 2026:KHC:44564 WP No. 14743 of 2024 BRANCH OFFICE AT: NO. 87/6, RICHMOND ROAD, RICHMOND TOWER, BENGALURU - 560 026 EARLIERE REPRESENTED BY SRI. YATHISH KUMAR B.T. NOW, SRI. HARIPRASAD, BRANCH MANAGER 2. SRI. VINOD KUMAR, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE, MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER M/S. INDIA BULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD., HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.87/6, RICHMOND ROAD, RICHMOND TOWER BENGALURU - 560 025. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010300002024 NC: 2026:KHC:44564 WP No. 14743 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Sri.H.V.Krishnamurthy., counsel on behalf of Sri.Leeladhar.H.P., for the petitioners and Francis Xavier., counsel for respondent No.1 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about infructuous of the petition. The oral submission is placed on record. The Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Because of disposal of the writ petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45