1 CGHC010089762019 2026:CGHC:34345 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2235 of 2019 1 - Shri Alok Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Neelkanth Pandey Aged About 31 Years R/o Village - Banari Tehsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Executive Director (Human Resources) Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Raipur Head Office - District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Deputy General Manager (Human Recourses), Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Head Office Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Engineer (Distribution), Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintending Engineer, (Civil) Cspdcl Madwa Plant Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 5 - Executive Director Rajnandgaon Area Cspdcl Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shri Manish Pandey S/o Shri Abhimanyu Pandey Aged About 31 Years Near Mata Chaura Gali No. 08 Behind Sbt College Kududand Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Advocate For Respondent(s) No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Utkarsh Patel on behalf of Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate SB – Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 05/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5 submits that the order of appointment passed in favour of the petitioner has been revoked on 12/03/2020 (Annexure A/3) to which learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be granted the liberty to question the said order in accordance with law. 2. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, it appears that this writ petition has become infructuous as no cause of action survives, however, petitioner is at liberty to question the aforesaid order in accordance with law. 3 3. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Harneet