1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 6123 of 2026 Sandeep Acharya & Ors `…. Petitioners Represented by Mr. D.Choudhury, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha & Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. A.R.Dash, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 08.04.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayer: “The petitioners, therefore, pray that this Hon’ble Court would graciously be pleased to consider the above stated facts and circumstances of the case, admit this writ petition, issue notice to the Opp.Parties under Rule NISI calling upon the Opposite Party No. 2 to show cause as to why the revision petition filed by the petitioners shall not be entertained and disposed of within a stipulated time period and if the Opp. Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause the said Rule be made absolute and any direction in the nature of mandamus may be issued to the Opp.Party No.2 to prepare the Hal ROR in favour of the petitioners in consonance with the facts stated therein i.e. Annexure-1 And further be pleased to pass any such other order/orders, direction/directions as would be deemed fit and proper in the bonafide interest of justice. And for this act of kindness the petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray. Order No. 03. 2 | P a g e 3. It is observed that the petitioners have already filed a revision petition being Revision Petition No. 1045 of 2016 before the Joint Commissioner, Odisha, Cuttack which is said to be pending. Since the revisional authority is in seisin over the matter, the writ application is disposed of directing the Joint Commissioner to expeditiously dispose of the aforementioned revision case, preferably within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioners. This order shall not operate if the revision case is found to have been disposed of in the meantime. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak