Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32744 (CAL)

MRIGANKA PORIA AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1692/2026 · 2026-08-05

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.288. Rakib CRM (M) 1692 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Mriganka Poria & Anr. ……Petitioners. Mr. Navanil De Mr. Srinjan Ghosh .....for the Petitioners. Mr. Amitabha Ghosh Ms. Arpita Paul Biswas Mr. Buddhadeb Chatterjee ......for the De-facto complainant. Mr. Biswajit Tiwari Ms. Tatini Sengupta ......for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that he has instruction not to proceed with the bail application. Learned advocate for the State as well as the de-facto complainant is present. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1692 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)