IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6382 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2025 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Hukumdeo Yadav S/o Late Rajdeo Yadav R/o Village - Bijuliya, P.S - Biraul, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Biraul P.S. Case no.262 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are said to have assaulted the informant and the members of his family. The petitioner is said to have assaulted with a farsa causing injury on the head of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is allegation of assault on three accused persons. The cause of false implication is the land dispute between the parties. The Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6382 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner of having assaulted with a farsa on the head of the informant as a result of which he had fracture of the skull and he fell down unconscious. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations of assault with a farsa against the petitioner together with the corresponding injuries having been found on the body of the informant, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. 7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months. Saurabh/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T