1 CGHC010313472024 2026:CGHC:37363 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4680 of 2024 Jageshwar Prasad Sonwani S/o Nepal Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Giraudpuri, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Balodabazar Bhatapara District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 5 - Tikeshwar S/o Jagdish R/o Village Gidhouri, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 6 - Pawan S/o Chainsingh R/o Village Kauvatal, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 7 - Kanhaiya S/o Nepal Singh R/o Village Gidhouri, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.08.21 15:29:56 +0530 2 8 - Omprakash S/o Maharathi, R/o Village Gidhouri, Tahsil Kasdol District Balodabazar -Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 9 - Makardhwaj S/o Nepal Singh, R/o Village Gidhouri, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar -Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate For Respective Respondents : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer, Mr. SP Sannat, Advocate and Mr. Utkarsh Shrivas, Advocate S B: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 20/08/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : 10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to directed the respondent no. 1 to 4 to call relevant records, pertaining to the instant matter. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 to 4 to remove the encroachment done by respondent no. 5 to 9 on government land i.e. part 0.947 H. of Government land 2094/1 A, at village Girodpuri, P.H.no. 32. 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to restrain the respondent no. 5 and 9 from further building/construction on government land i.e. part 0.947 H. of Government land 2094/1. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that a reply has already been filed in this case, in which, it has been categorically stated that the State has complied with the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner and a notice has been issued to the encroacher in accordance with law. As such, this petition has 3 become infructuous. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the State, this Court observes that the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner have been duly complied with by the authorities concerned. Consequently, no further proceedings are required in this matter. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the Petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay