1 CGHC010118652023 2026:CGHC:34330 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 590 of 2023 1 - Smt. Sahodra Bai Patil W/o Late Shri Om Prakash Patil Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Manikchoura, P.S. Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh At Present Resident Of Devrikhurd, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.................. Claimants 2 - Savitri Patil D/o Late Shri Om Prakash Patil Aged About 10 Years Mionr Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sahodra Bai Patil R/o Village Manikchoura, P.S. Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh At Present Resident Of Devrikhurd, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Bhupendra Patil S/o Late Shri Om Prakash Patil Aged About 7 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sahodra Bai Patil R/o Village Manikchoura, P.S. Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh At Present Resident Of Devrikhurd, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.................. Claimants 4 - Devendra Patil S/o Late Shri Om Prakash Patil Aged About 5 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sahodra Bai Patil R/o Village Manikchoura, P.S. Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh At Present Resident Of Devrikhurd, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.................. Claimants 5 - Shiv Singh S/o Lainu Satnami Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Manikchoura, P.S. Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh At Present Resident Of Devrikhurd, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.................. Claimants Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.08.06 10:21:21 +0530 2 6 - Ramhin Patil S/o Shiv Singh Patil Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Manikchoura, P.S. Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh At Present Resident Of Devrikhurd, P.S. Torwa, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.................. Claimants ... Appellants versus 1 - Narayan Singh Chouhan S/o Jagannath Singh Chouhan R/o Ward No. 06, Pandariya, P.S. Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh (Driver And Owner Of The Offending Vehicle Motorcycle Bearing Registration C.G. 09/ J.H. – 9749) 2 - Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Branch Manager Branch Office Thrid Floor, Gurukripa Tower, Near I.C.I.C.I Bank Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of The Offending Vehicle Motorcycle Bearing Registration C.G. 09/ J.H. - 9749) ... Respondents For Appellants : Mr. C.K. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Adv. For Respondent No.1 : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (05.08.2026) 1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, "the Act of 1988") by the appellants/claimants assailing the award dated 23.02.2023 passed by learned 8th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur (C.G.), in Claim Case No.663/2021, whereby the Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of Rs.19,63,440/- on account of the death of Om Prakash Patil, who succumbed to the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 27.12.2020. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the Tribunal has failed to grant the requisite enhancement of 10% 3 towards the conventional heads, namely loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium, in terms of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is, therefore, submitted that the compensation awarded under the conventional heads deserves suitable enhancement in accordance with the settled principles of law. 3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2/Insurance Company supports the impugned award and submits that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just, fair and reasonable and does not warrant any interference by this Court. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length, considered their rival submissions and carefully perused the entire record. 5. Upon perusal of the impugned award, it is evident that the Tribunal has awarded Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate, Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs.40,000/- towards loss of consortium, aggregating to Rs.2,70,000/- under the conventional heads. Since the accident occurred on 27.12.2020, the claimants are entitled to an enhancement of 10% on the amounts payable under the conventional heads as per National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680. Accordingly, the amounts payable towards loss of estate and funeral expenses stand enhanced to Rs.16,500/- each, while the amount payable towards loss of consortium comes to Rs.44,000/-. 6. It is also not in dispute that there are six claimants. Hence, all the claimants shall be entitled towards loss of consortium of Rs.44,000/- each, totalling Rs.2,64,000/-. 7. Thus, the compensation payable under the conventional heads is recomputed as under: Loss of Estate : Rs.16,500/- Funeral Expenses : Rs.16,500/- 4 Loss of Consortium (Rs.44,000/- × 6) : Rs.2,64,000/- Total : Rs.2,97,000/- 8. Since the Tribunal has already awarded Rs.2,70,000/- under the conventional heads, the appellants become entitled to an additional sum of Rs.27,000/- (2,97,000 – 2,70,000) under the said heads. 9. Consequently, the appellants/claimants shall be entitled to an additional/enhanced compensation of Rs.27,000/- over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal. The enhanced amount shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of its actual realization. The remaining terms and conditions of the impugned award shall remain unaltered. 10.Accordingly, the appeal stands partly allowed and the impugned award is modified to the aforesaid extent. 11.The Registry is directed to communicate the claimants in writing “the enhanced/additional amount” in this appeal as against the award made by the concerned Tribunal. The said communication be made in Hindi Deonagri language and the help of paralegal workers may be availed with a co-ordination of Secretary, Legal Aid of the concerned area wherein the claimants reside. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu