Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 327 (JK)

MOUNTAIN AND DREAMS TH.SADDAM HUSSAIN THAKEERY v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.COMMR/SECTY TO (TOURISM DEPARTMENT) AND OTHERS

WP(C)/680/2026 · 2026-04-07

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.No.179 Supp. Case List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 680/2026 CM(1726/2026) MOUNTAIN AND DREAMS TH.SADDAM HUSSAIN THAKEERY …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s). Through: Mr. Sheikh Manzoor, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.COMMR/SECTY TO (TOURISM DEPARTMENT) AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s). Through: Mr. Haaris Khan, AC vice Mr. Mohsin-ul-Showkat Qadiri, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 07.04.2026 1. While the matter was being heard, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the respondents have issued a fresh tender notice vide No. CEO/SDA/2026/35-43 dated 04.04.2026. It was further submitted that, in such circumstances, the relief prayed for by the petitioner cannot be granted at this stage, as the petitioner only has a right to participate in the fresh tender process. 2. When confronted with the aforesaid position, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 07-04-2026 Mubashir