Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32694 (PNJ)

ANNU KUMARI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CWP/15338/2026 · 2026-07-23

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15338-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-15338-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.07.2026 Annu Kumari ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate with Mr. Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the action of the respondent/Commission for issuing admit card to the petitioner for the combined subject knowledge test. Further a writ of mandamus has been sought, directing the respondent/Commission to issue admit card to the petitioner for the combined subject knowledge test to be held on dated 17.05.2026 in pursuance to application form dated 08.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) submitted for the post of PGT (Computer Science) in pursuance to the advertisement No.23/2026 dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1). MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.23 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. CWP-15338-2026 2 2. Reply on behalf of respondent No.2 has been filed in the Court, which is taken on record. Copy thereof shall be supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2/Commission submits that nothing survives in the present petition and the prayer of the petitioner cannot be accepted, at this stage as the selection process has made substantial headway and written examination has already been conducted. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 23.07.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.23 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.