Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32693 (PNJ)

SHEELA DEVI v. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

CWP/18502/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 134 SHEELA DEVI STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA respondents/State Bank of India allegedly made by the petitioner and credit the amount back to her account. 2. has been reversed and credited to the petitioner’s account on 14.07.2026 b SBI Peralam Branch. A communication to this effect from the Chief Manager retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’. 3. stands disposed of as such. July 22, 2026 Jaspreet Kaur IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SHEELA DEVI Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Nitin Bhanwala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate and Mr. Teginder Singh, Advocate for the respondents/Bank. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of respondents/State Bank of India (SBI) to reverse the incorrect transaction made by the petitioner and credit the amount back to her account. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that the amount of has been reversed and credited to the petitioner’s account on 14.07.2026 b SBI Peralam Branch. A communication to this effect Chief Manager has been produced by learned State counsel retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’. The petition, accordingly, has been rendered infru stands disposed of as such. July 22, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18502-2026 Date of decision: July 22, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing to reverse the incorrect transaction made by the petitioner and credit the amount back to her account. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that the amount of ₹14,265 has been reversed and credited to the petitioner’s account on 14.07.2026 by the SBI Peralam Branch. A communication to this effect dated 21.07.2026 received produced by learned State counsel, which is The petition, accordingly, has been rendered infructuous and (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE  : Yes/No : Yes/No ...Petitioner ...Respondents directing to reverse the incorrect transaction 14,265 the dated 21.07.2026 received is ctuous and JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.23 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh