HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17840 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Sri Saurabh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sharad Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to respondent No. 2 to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 06.04.2026 and pass appropriate reasoned order by affording ample opportunity of being heard to the petitioners within stipulated time as per fixed by this Hon'ble court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 06.04.2026 before respondent No. 2, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned counsels for respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2026 in accordance with law maximum within period of six weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order after providing opportunity of hearing to all concerned. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. May 6, 2026 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sharad Sharma (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Merajul Hasan And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad