1 CGHC010063432021 2026:CGHC:35698 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1435 of 2021 1 - Dilip Yadav S/o Shri Gurhiram Yadav Aged About 43 Years R/o Word No. 14 Sant Kabir Nagar Sirgitti, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Public Interactions Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Public Interactions Bilaspur Division District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The District Education Officer District- Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Superintendence Of Police Anti Corruption Bureau Rajbhavan Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Deputy Superintendence Of Police Anti Corruption Bureau Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Officer In Charge Police Station State Economic Crime Investigation Bureau And Anti Corruption Bureau Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.08.13 18:08:25 +0530 2 8 - Purshottam Patel Principal Government Higher Secondary School Tuman Block- Kartala, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 9 - M.P. Singh Assistant Development Program Officer Incharge Agragaman Training Institute I.T.I. Premises Korba District- Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Shukla, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Laywer Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 12/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, he is not pressing the same. 2. Learned State counsel not opposed the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi