20.08.2026 Serial no. 13 [Srimanta] Ct. No. – 39 Bail Allowed CRM (A) 2100 of 2026 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with G. R. Case No. 1200/2026 arising out of Islampur Police Station Case No. 414/2026 dated 02.05.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/303(2)/329(4)/3(5)/351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Islampur, Uttar Dinajpur -And- In the matter of : JALALUDDIN & ORS. … … Petitioners. Mr. Sourav Mondal, Mr. M. Nazar Chowdhury, Ms. Farheen Rais, Mr. Yousuf Hassan, Mr. Arijit Bhuiya, Advocates … … For the Petitioners. Mr. Kaustav Manna, Advocate … …For the State. Ms. Amita Gour, Mr. S. Alam, Advocates ……For the De Facto Complainant. 1. Memo of evidence, filed by the State in Court today, be kept with the record. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that total 11 accused persons have been implicated in this case including the present petitioners due to long standing property disputes. He further submits that the petitioner no. 1 is a 70-year-old man who can not even stand on his legs. He prays for anticipatory bail of the petitioners on any terms and conditions. 2 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the de facto complainant strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the victim suffered fracture injuries. 4. On the other hand, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State produces the Memo of Evidence as well as Case Diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having heard the submission of the respective parties and on perusal of the materials on record, case diary, Injury Reports and X-ray Report, this Court does not find any grievous injury suffered by the victim. In view of the above backdrop, this Court deems it fit to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners since there is no need of custodial interrogation. 6. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner nos. 1 to 10, namely, JALALUDDIN, RAJA @ AHMED REZA, MAKTUB AALM, MUJAHID @ MD. MUJAHID ALAM, MOIFA @ MEYEFA KHATUN, KHATAJE @ KHATIJA BEGUM, JINNATARA @ ZINAT ARA, SAMA PARBIN, SALAUDDIN, LAJIMA @ LEJIMA KHATUN is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 8. In the event the petitioners fail to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 9. The application for anticipatory bail being CRM(A) 2100 of 2026 is, thus, allowed. 3 10. All concerned parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. Concerned department is directed to supply urgent certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)