Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32674 (PAT)

Bimlesh Thakur v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./5980/2026 · 2026-02-04

S B P Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5980 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2025 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Bimlesh Thakur S/o Ramanandan Thakur R/o Village - Balha, Ps- Keoti, Dist- Darbhanga 2. Sanjay Thakur S/o Ramanandan Thakur R/o Village - Balha, Ps- Keoti, Dist- Darbhanga 3. Jaynarayan Thakur S/o Sakal Dev Thakur R/o Village - Balha, Ps- Keoti, Dist- Darbhanga 4. Nirmala Devi W/o Sakal Dev Thakur R/o Village - Balha, Ps- Keoti, Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baidyanath Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 74, 76, 77, 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that on 01.09.2025, all the F.I.R. named accused persons brutally assaulted his sons, as a result of which they sustained injuries. It is also alleged that they tried to outrage the modesty Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5980 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 of the daughters of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and they have committed no offence at all rather they have been falsely implicated in the case due to previous land dispute and local village politics. Both the parties are agnates and neighbours and due to land dispute, a simple scuffle took place between the parties wherein both the parties sustained injuries. Learned counsel further submits that the case has been compromised by both the parties and copy of compromise petition has been brought on record as Annexure- P/3. A statement has been made in para 3 of the bail application that petitioners have clean antecedents. 5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail. 7. Let the petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XI, Darbhanga, in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5980 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 Section 482 of B.N.S.S., as also with the condition that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner. Ankit Kumar/- (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) U T