Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32672 (PNJ)

HEMAN RAWAT v. PARDEEP KUMAR, IAS AND ANR

COCP/2448/2026 · 2026-07-21

Vikas Suri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 COCP-2448-2026 Date of Decision: 21.07.2026 Heman Rawat ....Petitioner Versus Pardeep Kumar and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Mr. A.V.S Parmar, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. **** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 06.04.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by this Court in CWP-10163-2026. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid order has since been substantially complied with and the petitioner is satisfied with an alternate number assigned to him, by the authorities concerned. 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner does not survive. Thus, he prays for withdrawal of the present petition. 4. Learned State counsel appearing for respondents affirms the factum of order dated 06.04.2026 having been substantially complied with. 5. In view of the aforesaid, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the present petition. 6. Dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Rule stands discharged. (VIKAS SURI) July 21, 2026 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VARINDER PRASHAD 2026.07.22 19:25 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC