1 CGHC010240302023 2026:CGHC:37543-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1709 of 2023 Omprakash Sahu S/o Shri Benuram Sahu, Aged About 21 Years R/o Jayanti Nagar, Near Nahar Gali, Police Station Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 2. Santosh Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Ganpat Ram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years R/o Jayanti Nagar, Sikola Basti, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 3. Sulochana Sahu, W/o Santosh Kumar Sahu, Aged About 31 Years R/o Jayanti Nagar, Sikola Basti, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 4. Yamini Sahu (Minor) Aged About 9 Years Through Father Omprakash Sahu, R/o Jayanti Nagar, Sikola Basti, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 5. Girija Bai, W/o Late Ganpat Ram Sahu, Aged About 65 Years R/o Jayanti Nagar, Sikola Basti, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.08.24 11:34:36 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Anusha Naik, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 21 .08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Anusha Naik, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is therefore respectfully prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the entire charge-sheet/challan in connection with Crime No. 336 of 2017 dated 28.07.2023 filed by Police Station Mohan Nagar Durg (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is still absconding and that his anticipatory bail application has already been rejected. He further submits that he has no instructions in the present case. Therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. 4. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 3 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan