Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19.08.2026 Sl.No. 19 Ct. No. 39 D.Hira (Allowed) In The High Court At Calcutta Appellate Side
CRM (A) No. 2078 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Gangajalghati Police Station Case No. 62/2026 dated 01.04.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109(1)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of : Ashish Mondal. … petitioner
Ms. Jharna Biswas, Ms. Susmita Biswas Chowdhury. … for the petitioner
Mr. Radhey Shyam Tiwari. … for the State
1. Memo of evidence be taken on record.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of Maya Mondal, who is also one of the accused in the present case. The de facto complainant is his mother, and the victim is his father. There is also a counter-case between the parties over the issue of landed property.
3. It is submitted that actually the wife of the petitioner no. 1 suffered grievous injuries in the same incident. She
2 was granted bail by the Sessions Court under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.
4. He prays for anticipatory bail in any terms and conditions.
5.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail by referring an injury report.
6. Having heard the learned counsels for the respective parties and on perusal of the case diary including injury report and nature of injuries suffered by the victim, this court is of the view that this is not a fit case for custodial interrogation/detention.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, 1) Ashish Mondal is allowed.
8. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
9. In the event the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law.
10. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
3
11. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
12. Concerned Department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )