21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:2747 BA1 No.438 of 2026 Ripin Kaintura Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Chittrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/FIR No.63 of 2025, under Section 64(2)(f), 351(3) of B.N.S. and under Section 66E and 67A of Information Technology Act, P.S. Kampty, District Tehri Garhwal. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that victim has not supported the prosecution story and she has denied that any offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault/rape has been committed by the applicant; she has also denied in her statement that no obscene video was made by the applicant, as alleged. 5. Learned State counsel opposed the bail application. 6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Ripin Kaintura be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 17.04.2026 Arti