1 CGHC010311392026 2026:CGHC:37236 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1044 of 2026 1 - Sumendra S/o Late Gujra Ram Aged About 43 Years R/o Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 2 - Rustam Rishi S/o Late Gujra Ram Aged About 40 Years R/o Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 3 - Bharti Rishi D/o Late Bhagwan Das, Aged About 37 Years R/o Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 4 - Aarti Rishi D/o Late Bhagwan Das, Aged About 29 Years R/o Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 5 - Karti Rishi D/o Late Bhagwan Das, Aged About 24 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As Kali In Impugned Order) R/o Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 6 - Bhupendra Kumar Rishi S/o Late Bhagwan Das, Aged About 21 Years R/o Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 7 - Swati Rishi S/o. Late Bhagwan Das Aged About 19 Years (Wrongly Mentionered As Swami In Impugned Order)r/o Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Divya Dubey W/o Hariram Dubey, Aged About 51 Years R/o Kabir Ward , Darripara Ambikapur, P.S. Manipur, P.O. Ambikapur , Tahsil Ambikapur, District. Surguja, C.G. 2 - T.S. Singh Dev S/o Maharaja M.S. Singh Dev, Aged About 73 Years R/o Kothighar, Ambikapur, P.S And P.O. Ambikapur , , District. Surguja, C.G. ... Respondent(s) SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.08.20 11:30:39 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanka Mehta, Advocate For Respondent No.1/ Caveator : Mr. Giriwar Prajapati, Advocate and Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 19/08/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail all their defences before the learned trial Court. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit