204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 01.05.2026 1. CRM-M-8754-2026 KRISH SHARMA ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT 2. CRM-M-10389-2026 MANVEER GURJAR ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Shailender Singh Baisla, Advocate and Ms. Priya Bhati, Advocate for Mr. Divij Datt, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.141 dated 14.11.2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 324(4), 309(6) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) at Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad. MANISHA 2026.05.05 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-8754-2026 -2- & 01 connected case 2. In the present matter, a compromise has been effected between the parties. Petitioners along with co-accused has approached this Court by way of filing a petition bearing CRM-M-7466-2026 (O & M) titled as ‘Prateek and others vs. State of Haryana and others’ for quashing of present FIR on the basis of said compromise, which has been allowed vide order of even date. 3. In view of the above, both petitions stands disposed of as having been rendered as infructuous. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. (SUBHAS MEHLA) May 01, 2026 JUDGE manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.05.05 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document