Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010016852026 2026:GAU-AS:2183- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/228/2026 HALIMAN NESSA D/O LT SURJYAT ALI @ SURJYAT MIYA FATHER AND RUPBHAN NESSA @ RUP BHANU MOTHER W/O AYNAL HOQUE @ AYNAL HOQUE KHANDAKAR VILL KURIHA PO KHARDHAR MOUZA BETBARI PS BARPETA DIST BARPETA ASSAM PIN 781309 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, SASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REP. BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110001 4:THE STATE CO ORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS ASSAM GUWAHATI-05 DIST- KAMRUP (M) 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BAJALI DIST BAJALI ASSAM PIN 781325 Page No.# 2/3 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) BAJALAI DIST BAJALI ASSAM PIN 78132 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED, T UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, NRC,SC, ECI,SC, F.T BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 13.02.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned CGC; Mr. G. Sarma, learned standing counsel for the FT matters and NRC; Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. A.I. Ali, learned standing counsel for the ECI; and Mr. H.K. Hazarika, learned Junior Government Advocate for the State respondent. 2. Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions has submitted that there is an inadvertent mistake in the cause title of this interlocutory application owing to omission to implead the prospective parties, who are to be impleaded as respondents No. 7 and 8. Accordingly, a prayer is made by learned counsel for the applicant to withdraw this interlocutory application with a liberty to the applicant to approach again for impleading the prospective parties 3. The prayer is allowed. Page No.# 3/3 4. This interlocutory application stands dismissed on withdrawal with a liberty to approach again to implead the prospective respondents No. 7 and 8 respectively. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant