Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3262 (AP)

ARYA VYSYA FRIENDS ASSOCIATION, PRAKASAM DIST & 3 OTHERS v. SECY REVENUE (ENDOWMENT.I) DEPT, HYD & 8 OT

WP/18086/2013 · 2026-06-23

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation:__________ Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 24.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010085392013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 18086/2013 Between: 1. ARYA VYSYA FRIENDS ASSOCIATION, PRAKASAM DIST & 3 OTHERS, REP. ITS PRESIDENT KOTHURU VIJAYA KUMAR S/O SATYANARYANA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS SINGARAYAKONDA PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2. KOTHURU VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O SATYANARYANA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PROP. SRI HANIMAN CUT PIECES, D.NO.2-217 (NEW) SRI ITHA RAMAIAH SETTY CHOULTRY, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 3. PADARTHI VENKATA SUBBA RAO, S/O KOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP. PADMA FANCY GENERAL STORES, SRI ITHA RAMAIAH SETTYCHOULTRY, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. SOMISETTY LAKSHMI, W/O BALAKRISHINA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D2 MOBILES, D.NO. 2-235 (NEW) SRI ITHA RAMAIAH SETTY CHOULTRY, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DIST ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SECY REVENUE ENDOWMENT I DEPT HYD 8 OT, REVENUE (ENDOWMENT.I) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, DHARMIKA BHAVAN, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GUNTUR. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. ITHA RAMAIAH SETTY CHOULTRY, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE 2 OFFICER, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. BATCHU KOTESWARA RAO, S/O KAILASAPATHI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SRI ITHA RAMAIAH SETTY CHOULTRY, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. CHINTALAPUDI BALA RAMAIAH, S/O. BATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, BALAYOGINAGAR SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. TANNERU PITCHAMMA, W/O GURAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O KALIKAVAI (VIA) SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue any appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in appointing the Trust board and Executive officer with theunofficial Respondents Nos. 6 to 8 herein in respect of Sri Itha Ramaiah Setty Choultry i.e., 3rd respondent vide Procs. A5/8575/2011 dt. 3.1.2012 in violation of the orders passed by the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.1098 dt. 11.9.2008, as being illegla, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and issue appropriate directions for the proper manatgement of the Sri Itha Ramaiah Setty Choultrya and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 22042 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent authorities to prevent the Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 from making any construction or changing the nature of the land belonging to the Itha Ramaiah Setty Chou'try, situated in Sy.No. 500/1A, 1C of Somarajupalli Singarayakonda village and Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V T M PRASAD 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.18086 of 2013 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners represented and stated that cause in the writ petition does not survive and that the matter has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the said submission, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.06.2026 KBN Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 4 11 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 18086 of 2013 Date: 24.06.2026 KBN