Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32614 (KAR)

SMT PUTTIRAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3273/2023 · 2026-08-13

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010079402023 NC: 2026:KHC:43061 WP No. 3273 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.3273 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUTTIRAMMA W/O CHIKKIREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT KALEGOWDANA DODDI, SHIVANAHALLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562117. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNA S. VYAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEP. OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU -560001. 2. MANJUNATH C., [KAS] THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB -DIVISION, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010079402023 NC: 2026:KHC:43061 WP No. 3273 of 2023 RAMANAGARA - 562159. 3. THE TAHSILDAR KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, KANAKAPURA - 562117. 4. SMT. SAMRAJYAMMA C/O KRISHNAPPA, PIPELINE ROAD, GANGOTHRI SCHOOL, AZEEZ NAGARA, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. S.P. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ORDER DATED 14/11/2022 IN RA (LKP)NO.1008/2022-23 AS PER ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010079402023 NC: 2026:KHC:43061 WP No. 3273 of 2023 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner in this Writ Petition is assailing the order dated 14.11.2022 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2. 3. Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3, raised preliminary objection, that the petitioner is having efficacious remedy under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 4. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, petitioner is relegated to approach the revisional jurisdiction accordingly. 5. It is made clear that the time spent by the petitioner in this Writ Petition shall be condoned in terms of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, in the event petitioner approaches the revisional jurisdiction within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010079402023 NC: 2026:KHC:43061 WP No. 3273 of 2023 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. 7. Pending applications do not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SAC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3