IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6682 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2025 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Gango Ray @ Ganga Ray S/o Late Ramchandra Ray R/o Village - Naya Tola Mekra, P.S - Mokama, District - Patna 2. Kongresh Ray @ Kangresh Ray S/o Gango Ray @ Ganga Ray R/o Village - Naya Tola Mekra, P.S - Mokama, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehended their arrest in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 156 of 2025, F.I.R dated 05.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections of 447, 323, 327, 506, 504 & 34 the Indian Penal Code and 329(3), 115(2), 119(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, on 04.04.2025 at 12 ‘o’ Clock night, the accused persons have looted sacks of wheat which is weight about 16 quintals at gun point. It is further alleged that all accused persons fired and created havoc and assaulted the informant and threatened them. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6682 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for an existing land dispute, the instant case is said to have been lodged making an allegation of looting sacks of wheat to the tune of 16 quintals at gunpoint, whereas, in the First Information Report no case has been registered under the Arms Act. It is next submitted that the petitioners have two antecedents, in which he is on bail, and they are not akin to the instant case, and there is a delay of about 05 days in registering the F.I.R. The petitioners undertake to maintain peace and harmony with the informant and the family members and would not tamper with the evidence. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M, III or his successor, Barh, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6682 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 District-Patna in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 156 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. abhishekkr/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T