Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32610 (PNJ)

DEEPAK ALIAS DEEP ALIAS MAANA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/39231/2026 · 2026-07-20

H S Grewal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-39231-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 175 CRM-M-39231-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 DEEPAK ALIAS DEEP ALIAS MAANA .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Kunal Choksi, Advocate and Mr. Sumit Kumar Rangi, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 482 Cr.P.C.) for quashing of order dated 24.10.2025 (Annexure P-9) passed by ld. Addl. Sessions Court, Ludhiana in Case No.SC/416/2021, whereby the petitioner was declared a Proclaimed Offender in proceedings arising out of FIR No.0120 dated 03.09.2020 (Annexure P-1) for offence under Sections 391, 395 and 397 of the IPC registered at Police Station Sadar, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana, Punjab and all other subsequent proceedings initiated under Sections 83 and 446 Cr.P.C. (85 and 491 BNSS). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 28.01.2025, the learned trial Court had cancelled the bail orders of the petitioner and his bail bonds and surety bonds were ordered to be forfeited to the State and petitioner was ordered to be summoned through non-bailable warrants of arrest. He further submits thereafter the petitioner tried his best but was unable to arrange the requisite amount of furnishing fresh bail and surety ANJAL GUPTA 2026.07.22 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-39231-2026 2 bonds of Rs.1,00,000/-each. Furthermore, the petitioner was skeptical and apprehensive that if he approaches the Court again, he would be taken into custody and hence he chose not to appear 23.07.2025 onwards. As such the learned trial Court vide order dated 24.10.2025(Annexuare P-9) again declared him as a proclaimed offender. He further prays that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the Court and the impugned order 24.10.2025 (Annexure P-9) passed by learned Addl. Sessions Court, Ludhiana, be set aside. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. P.S.Pandher, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 24.10.2025 passed by ld. Addl. Sessions Court, Ludhiana. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within a period of 07 days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, on his doing so, the trial Court is directed to consider and decide the same within a period of 03 days. 7. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 20.07.2026 JUDGE Anjal Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2026.07.22 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document