2026:HHC:12192 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No. 94 of 2021 Date of decision: 17.04.2026 Kesav Ram …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transport Corp. & Anr. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin C. Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate. G. S. Sandhawalia , Chief Justice (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that execution petition as such has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 2. However, since the matter was not listed for five years, the explanation given by the Registrar (Judicial) on constraint of lack of space as such, is not accepted. 3. Let the matter be looked into and the responsibility be fixed on the concerned official(s) for non-listing of the matter for five years. 4. The report be submitted on the administrative side. (G. S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin C. Negi) 17th April, 2026 (sanjeev) Judge