REJAUL SK @ CHOTTU @ REJAUL SEKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2119/2026 · 2026-08-20
Ajay Kumar Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32606 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32606 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
20.08.2026 Item No. 22 Ct. No. 39 C.R.M.(A) 2119 of 2026 AN (ALLOWED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Paikar Police Station Case No. 129 of 2026 dated 26.04.2026 under Sections 126(2) / 118(1) / 110 / 79 /351(2)(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 987 of 2026 now pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat, Birbhum. In the matter of : Rejaul Sk. @ Chottu @ Rejaul Sekh … Petitioner. Mr. Jahangir Hossain Mr. Saptarshi Chakraborty …for the Petitioner. Dr. Pradip Banerjee Ms. Swagata Das …for the State. 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioner on any terms and conditions. 2. On the other hand, learned advocate representing the State produces the case diary, the memo of evidence and relies upon the injury report and the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, 2023 and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 3. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusing the materials available on record, the case diary including the injury report and the
statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, 2023, this Court finds that the injury suffered by the victim is simple in nature and furthermore, there is no such convincing material against the petitioner. 4. In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any necessity for custodial interrogation/detention of the petitioner and, hence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed. 5. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 6. In the event the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as imposed by this Court, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 7. C.R.M.(A) 2119 of 2026 stands disposed of. 8.
All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 2
9. The concerned Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)
3