Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32601 (MAD)

R.Kanagaraj v. The Assistant Director

WP/18225/2026 · 2026-06-02

Mohammed Shaffiq

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18225 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 18225 of 2026 R.Kanagaraj ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Collectorate, Villupuram. 2. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 3. The Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Gingee, Villupuram District. 4. Jaisankar 5. Krishnan ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to take suitable legal action in pursuance to petitioner’s representation dated 10.3.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18225 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner : Mr.C.Munusamy For Respondents: Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar for Government for R1 to R3 ORDER By consent of learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. In view of the order that this Court proposes to pass and also the limited relief that is sought to be granted, notice to respondent Nos.4 and 5 is dispense with. 2. The writ petition has been filed to direct respondents 1 to 3 to take suitable legal action in pursuance to petitioner’s representation dated 10.03.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that respondents 4 and 5 have been excavating sand without obtaining requisite permission/license from competent authorities, as a result, petitioner’s agricultural operations in the adjacent land owned by him has been adversely affected. It is in such circumstances, that representation dated 10.03.2026 was made by petitioner to take suitable action again the illegal excavation of sand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18225 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 4. Learned State Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 would submit that after issuing notice to petitioner, adjacent land owners and any other interested parties, appropriate orders would be passed. 5. In view thereof, there shall be a direction to respondents 1 to 3, to consider petitioner’s representation dated 10.03.2026 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, after issuing notice and affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioner, respondents 4 and 5 and any other interested persons, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the case. 6. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18225 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Collectorate, Villupuram. 2. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 3. The Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Gingee, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18225 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. MRN WP No.18225 of 2026 02-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis