IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 166 CR-5102-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision.:21.07.2026 Shelly Parmar and Another …..Pe22oners Vs. Manju Sharma .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate for the peoners. Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the caveator- respondent. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) CM-12925-CII-2026: This is an applicaon under Order XXII Rule 3 read with Secon 151 of the CPC to bring on record LRs of deceased Uma Handa, who was one of the respondent before learned Rent Controller. Applicaon is supported by affidavit of Shelly Parmar wife of Balvir Singh. As Shelly Parmar is stated to be the only legal heir, so the applicaon is allowed subject to all just and legal excepons. Amended memo of pares already filed, is taken on record. Main case.: The present revision peon has been preferred by the tenants under Secon 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restricon Act, 1949, assailing the order dated 08.10.2024 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur whereby the evicon peon instuted by the respondent-landlord under Secon 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restricon Act, 1949 was allowed on the ground of bona fide personal requirement. The appeal preferred by the peoners NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.07.23 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-5102-2026 (O&M) against the said order also came to be dismissed by the learned Appellate Authority, Hoshiarpur vide judgment dated 24.04.2026, thereby affirming the order of ejectment. 2. Aggrieved against the aforesaid concurrent orders, the present revision peon has been filed. 3. At the very outset, however, learned counsel appearing for the peoners, without entering into arguments on the merits of the controversy, submi?ed that the peoners would confine their prayer to seek reasonable me to vacate the demised shop. It is prayed that the peoners may be granted a period of nine months to hand over vacant possession of the premises. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-landlord opposed the request by poinng out that while passing the evicon order on 08.10.2024, the learned Rent Controller had already granted one month's me to vacate the premises. It is submi?ed that the peoners thereaAer connued to remain in possession during the pendency of the statutory appeal, which ulmately came to be dismissed on 24.04.2026. According to the learned counsel, grant of a further period of nine months would be wholly unreasonable. Nevertheless, on instrucons received from the respondent, learned counsel fairly submi?ed that the respondent would have no objecon, if a period of six months is granted to the peoners to vacate the premises, subject to appropriate safeguards. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the pares, this Court is of the view that the request for grant of reasonable me deserves to be accepted. The pares have substanally arrived at a consensus regarding the period within which the premises shall be vacated. Since the arrangement adequately balances the equies between the pares by protecng the landlord's right to obtain possession while simultaneously affording the tenant reasonable me to make alternave arrangements, the same deserves to be incorporated in the order. Page No. 2 of 4 Pages NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.07.23 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-5102-2026 (O&M) 6. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the concurrent findings recorded by the authories below, the present revision peon is disposed of with the following direcons: (i) The peoners-tenants shall vacate the demised premises and hand over peaceful, vacant and physical possession thereof to the respondent-landlord on or before 31.01.2027. (ii) The peoners shall clear all arrears of rent/user charges, if any, payable up to the date of handing over possession. (iii) The peoners shall connue to pay the agreed monthly rent/user charges regularly by the 7th day of each succeeding month ll delivery of vacant possession. (iv) In the event the peoners fail to hand over vacant possession on or before 31.01.2027, they shall be liable to pay mesne profits/use and occupaon charges at the rate of ₹50,000/- (Rupees FiAy Thousand only) per month with effect from 01.02.2027 ll the date the premises are actually vacated. This spulaon shall be without prejudice to the respondent-landlord's right to seek immediate execuon of the evicon order in accordance with law. 7. The grant of me to vacate shall remain subject to the peoners filing an undertaking before the learned Rent Controller/Execung Court within four weeks from today to the effect that they shall hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises on or before 31.01.2027, shall regularly pay the monthly rent/user charges as directed herein and shall not induct any third party or create any third-party interest in the premises. In case of failure to furnish the undertaking or breach of any of its terms, the benefit of extension of me granted by this order shall automacally stand withdrawn and the respondent- landlord shall be at liberty to execute the evicon order forthwith in accordance with law. Page No. 3 of 4 Pages NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.07.23 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-5102-2026 (O&M) 8. The revision peon stands disposed of in the above terms. Pending miscellaneous applicaon(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE July 21, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Page No. 4 of 4 Pages NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.07.23 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document