Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3260 (PNJ)

SUBHASH SEHGAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRM-M/23968/2026 · 2026-05-01

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 127 SUBHASH SEHGAL STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Ms. Divya Gulati, Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned representation dated 09.03.2026 stands duly considered and a speaking order has been passed on 15.04.2026, and no further action is warranted in respect thereof. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of passing of speaking order by t However, after arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative and efficacious remedies as may be availab with law. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. 01.05.2026 Gurpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: SUBHASH SEHGAL Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Divya Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel has made a statement that the petitioner’s representation dated 09.03.2026 stands duly considered and a speaking order has been passed on 15.04.2026, and no further action is warranted in respect Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of passing of speaking order by the authorities, the petitioner is still receiving threats. However, after arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative and efficacious remedies as may be available to the petitioner in accordance Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23968-2026 Date of decision: 01.05.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL for the petitioner. Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab. counsel has made a statement that the petitioner’s representation dated 09.03.2026 stands duly considered and a speaking order has been passed on 15.04.2026, and no further action is warranted in respect Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of passing he authorities, the petitioner is still receiving threats. However, after arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative le to the petitioner in accordance Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Petitioner s counsel has made a statement that the petitioner’s representation dated 09.03.2026 stands duly considered and a speaking order has been passed on 15.04.2026, and no further action is warranted in respect Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of passing he authorities, the petitioner is still receiving threats. However, after arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative le to the petitioner in accordance Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.