Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 326 (CHH)

SHELESH SETHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2831/2024 · 2026-01-27

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4654-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2831 of 2024 • Shelesh Sethi, S/o Sh. Ajay Sethi, Aged About 25 Years, Proprietor Ishar Das Sethi And Sons, Shop No.122, New Qutub Road, Sadar Bazar, Dilli-6, New Delhi Resident Of 14/4 F/F, Patel Nagar, West Central Delhi, Delhi-110008. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Rajhara, Tehsil And District Balod, Chhattisgarh. 2. Govind Wadhwani, S/o Virumal Wadhwani, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Ward No.25, Main Road, Dalli Rajhara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. S. Baghel, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 28.01.2026 Heard Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. S. Baghel, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. 1. The instant CRMP has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking following relief:- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the First Information Report dated 11.04.2024 (Annexure-P/1) at Police Station Rajhara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, being FIR No.0107, against the applicant for the alleged offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned State counsel submits that in the present case, charge sheet has been submitted before the concerned Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of the charge sheet before the competent Court. 4. In view of the prayer made, the instant CRMP is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if aggrieved by the charge sheet submitted against the petitioner. 5. Interim order granted earlier on 21.10.2024 by this Court, stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Deepti Jha