1 / 4 CGHC010197572020 2026:CGHC:36391 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 710 of 2020 1 - Pooran Lal S/o Late Shri Hari Prasad Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Jagnnath Dansena S/o Late Shri Harishankar Prasad Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Bhagwano D/o Late Sewakram Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Rajkumari W/o Late Ramlal Negi Aged About 65 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Neelkamal S/o Late Shri Rameshwar Prasad Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Teekaram S/o Late Shri Digamber Prasad Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Saheb Ram S/o Late Tilakram Dansena Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.08.17 17:40:25 +0530 2 / 4 8 - Ramesh Kumar S/o Late Bhuplal Aged About 25 Years R/o Near Murari Hotel Raigarh, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 9 - Digari Lal S/o Late Rooplal Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 10 - Ashok Kumar S/o Late Bholaram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 11 - Nagendra Negi S/o Late Heeralal Negi Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 12 - Shyamlal Negi S/o Late Shankar Prasad Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 13 - Medini Negi S/o Late Heeralal Negi Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Kosamnara, Tah. And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Amitabh Jain Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralay, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shri K.B. Ashwani Kumar Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Bridge Construction Division, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shri Bhim Singh Collector Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shri Yugal Kishore Urwasha Sub Divisional Officer Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shri Vikrant Singh Rathore Nayab Tahsildar Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 / 4 6 - Shri Nandram Patel Revenue Inspector Revenue Circle- Kirodimal Nagar Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 7 - Shri Anil Kumar Ram Patwari, Patwari Halka No. 8, Tahsil Raigargh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. M.K. Sinha, Advocate For Resp. No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate For Resp. No.3 to 5 : Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, Senior Advocate Mr. Indrajeet Singh Thakur, Advocate For Resp. No.6 & 7 : None appears. S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 14/08/2026 1. This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order on the part of respondents in not complying with the directives issued by the High Court vide order dated 09.03.2020 passed in WPC No.873 of 2020 (Pooran Lal & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.). 2. This contempt petition is filed alleging that the authority has called for original map for initiating proceeding of demarcation, but till filing of this contempt petition, demarcation could not be done for want of map. 3. During course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that after filing of this contempt petition, demarcation was conducted and report was submitted and thereafter Nayab Tahsildar vide order dated 21.06.2021 has closed the proceeding of demarcation observing that compliance of High Court’s order dated 09.03.2020 has been done. He contended that demarcation report and proceeding 4 / 4 recorded by Nayab Tahsildar on 21.06.2021 was put to challenge by the petitioners in WPC No.3361 of 2021 which was disposed of with direction to the Collector to get the land subject matter of petition to be demarcated under his supervision. Application has been filed. However, steps on the part of Collector are yet to be taken. 4. In the aforementioned facts of case when the demarcation has been done by the Revenue Authority pursuant to order subject matter of contempt i.e. order dated 09.03.2020 and aggrieved with which petitioners have already approached this Court by way of filing fresh writ petition bearing WPC No.3361 of 2021, which was disposed of on 08.05.2026 directing the Collector to get the land of the petitioners demarcated under his supervision, I do not find any good ground to continue any further in this contempt petition. 5. Accordingly, contempt proceeding initiated against respondents is dropped. Notice issued to respondents stands discharged. 6. Contempt Petition is closed. Sd/Sd Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen