CWP-21166-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.133 CWP-21166-2026 Decided on : 20.07.2026 Inderjeet and another ...... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL *** Present : Mr. Abhishek Choudhary, Advocate for Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** VIKAS BAHL J (ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of the order dated 23.06.2026 (Annexure P-1), show cause notice dated 06.06.2026 (Annexure P-2) and notice dated 01.07.2026 (Annexure P- 3). 2. On 15.07.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Present: Mr. Pradeep Panwar, Advocate for Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** Learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioners have alternative remedy. MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.07.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CWP-21166-2026 2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prays for time to get instructions in the matter. Adjourned to 20.07.2026.” 15.07.2026” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has again prayed for an adjournment without filing an adjournment slip. 4. Since we are not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the present petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same after the learned counsel for the petitioners is prepared to argue the matter and to answer the objection raised on behalf of the State. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) 20.07.2026 JUDGE mamta Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.07.22 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh