RAM DASS v. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS
CWP/22221/2026 · 2026-07-22
Aman Chaudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32561 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32561 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 111
CWP-22221-2026 Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 RAM DASS
... Petitioner VERSUS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Yesh Paul Malik, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is satisfied with the
order dated 03.12.2024, Annexure P-10, vide which his services have been regularized on a Class-IV post of Sewer Man in the pay scale of 750-940, however, seeks arrears of pay w.e.f. 01.10.2003, but only notional benefit has been granted. The said prayer is based on a judgment in the case of a similarly circumstanced employee Suresh Kumar passed in CWP-24400 of 2026 decided on 08.11.2023, against which the LPA No.2007 of 2024 has also been dismissed on 28.08.2024 and in compliance thereto, the arrears have also been released to him vide order dated 30.08.2024, Annexure P-15, in view of which he shall submit a supplementary representation giving all details appending therewith the copies of aforesaid orders, which he prays be directed to be decided in a time bound manner.
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.23 17:42 I am the author of this document
CWP-22221-2026
-2-
2.
Learned State Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made.
3.
In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case, the petitioner submits a representation in a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law within 06 months in light of the submissions made above and taking note of the documents/ orders that may be attached therewith, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner.
4.
Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to him interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 22, 2026.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.23 17:42 I am the author of this document