Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[165]
Ishwar Chand
State of Haryana and others
Coram :
Present:
PANKAJ JAIN
[1]
dated 07.05.2026 08.05.2026 and decide the petitioner's complaints afresh in accordance with law, and to take appropriate action on the basis of the inquiry reports against the officials/persons found responsible for [2]
same allegations on which the complaint was maintained at C.M. window FIR was registered. He however submits that a cancellation report has been filed by the [3]
or not, he submits that till today, no protest petition has been filed. [4]
a protest petition against the cancellation report, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to avail of the said remedy.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-22016 Date of Decision :
Ishwar Chand
Versus State of Haryana and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhimanyu Antil, DAG, Haryana.
****
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present writ petition is for quashing the report dated 07.05.2026 (Annexure P-16) and the consequential order dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P-17), for a direction to the respondents to reconsider and decide the petitioner's complaints afresh in accordance with law, and to take appropriate action on the basis of the inquiry reports against the officials/persons found responsible for the alleged irregularities.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that on the same allegations on which the complaint was maintained at C.M. window FIR was registered. He however submits that a cancellation report has been filed by the Police Authorities, giving clean chit to all the wrong doers.
On being asked as to whether any protest petition has been filed or not, he submits that till today, no protest petition has been filed.
Since the petitioner has an efficacious stat a protest petition against the cancellation report, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to avail of the said remedy.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 22016-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.07.2026
…Petitioner
….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhimanyu Antil, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in the present writ petition is for quashing the report and the consequential order dated , for a direction to the respondents to reconsider and decide the petitioner's complaints afresh in accordance with law, and to take appropriate action on the basis of the inquiry reports against the the alleged irregularities.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that on the same allegations on which the complaint was maintained at C.M. window FIR was registered. He however submits that a cancellation report has been giving clean chit to all the wrong doers. On being asked as to whether any protest petition has been filed or not, he submits that till today, no protest petition has been filed. the petitioner has an efficacious statutory remedy of filing a protest petition against the cancellation report, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to avail of the
Prayer in the present writ petition is for quashing the report and the consequential order dated , for a direction to the respondents to reconsider and decide the petitioner's complaints afresh in accordance with law, and to take appropriate action on the basis of the inquiry reports against the
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that on the same allegations on which the complaint was maintained at C.M. window, FIR was registered. He however submits that a cancellation report has been On being asked as to whether any protest petition has been filed utory remedy of filing a protest petition against the cancellation report, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to avail of the RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.22 16:23 I agree to specified portions of this document
CWP-22016-2026 (O&M)
-2-
[5]
In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take his remedies before the Criminal Court in accordance with law. [6]
If any protest petition is filed, the Court shall adjudicate the same without being prejudiced by any of the observations made while disposing off the complaint filed at C.M. window. [7]
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands
disposed off.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
20.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.22 16:23 I agree to specified portions of this document