Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-8767-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CRWP-8767-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 23.07.2026 RAVI & ANR. .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. S.K. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner(s) for directions to the respondent No.2 to protect their life and liberty from the respondents No.4 to 6.
2. The learned counsel representing the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner(s) has filed the representation dated 29.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time.
3.
Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 3 only.
VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.07.23 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8767-2026 (O&M) 2
4. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. Hence service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that a direction for disposing of the representation of the petitioner(s) (Annexure P-3) be given to the respondent No.2 and that the instant writ petition be disposed of accordingly.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner(s) (Annexure P-3) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar (respondent No.2) or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioners, and take an independent decision at his own level.
7. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. 23.07.2026
(SURYA PARTAP SINGH) Vinod
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.07.23 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document