Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32551 (KAR)

SRI B S V SWAMY v. SRI KUMARA VELU

CRL.RP/1852/2025 · 2026-07-28

H P Sandesh

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010791232025 NC: 2026:KHC:39190 CRL.RP No. 1852 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1852 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI B S V SWAMY S/O B R SHAIVANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS PROP. OF GANESH ENTERPRISES R/AT NO.324, 1ST CROSS 8TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, 4TH BLOCK BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 079. AND ALSO R/AT No.42, 4TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN, HAMPINAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJA S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI KUMARA VELU S/O SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.13, MANJUNATHA NAGARA, MAGADI ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU-560 023. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VIDYASAGAR H V, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010791232025 NC: 2026:KHC:39190 CRL.RP No. 1852 of 2025 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE COURT OF LXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-69) IN CRL. APPL.NO.27/2023 DATED 12.09.2025 AND ORDER PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE 23RD ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT AT BENGALURU CITY IN C.C.NO.4448/2019 DATED 09.12.2022, AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 13.07.2026, while considering IA No.1/2026 for extension of time to deposit the amount and also made it clear that time is granted to deposit the amount that is 2 weeks time failing which revision petition will be dismissed on the next date of hearing. In spite of extension of time by allowing IA No.1/2026, the conditional order is not complied with by the revision petitioner. When such being the case, the revision petitioner once again seeks time for extension of time to deposit the amount but not deposited the same till date. Under the circumstances, when the conditional order is not complied with by the revision petitioner, the - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010791232025 NC: 2026:KHC:39190 CRL.RP No. 1852 of 2025 question of considering this revision petition does not arise and the same is not yet admitted. Hence, revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40