Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32551 (CAL)

NAZRUL ISLAM GAZI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16008/2026 · 2026-08-07

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 7 20.08.2026 Court. No. 25 suvayan WPA 16008 of 2026 Nazrul Islam Gazi Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shrikant Ghosh Ms. Preksha Surana …for the petitioner. Ms. Sabita Roy Mr. Arani Das …for the State. 1. The matter is listed today under the heading “To be Mentioned” on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for correction in the order dated August 7, 2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order dated August 7, 2026 in paragraph no. 2, line no. 2 it is recorded as “passport” instead of “Visa” and in the third line of the said paragraph the month is to be read as “July” instead of “September”. 3. In view of the above, the order dated August 7, 2026 in line no. 2 the word “passport” shall be replaced the word “Visa” and in line no. 3 the month “September” be replaced the month “July”. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that in the order dated August 7, 2026 the name of the learned advocate appearing for the State is wrongly recorded as “Mr. Nripendra Pratap Singh” instead of “Ms. Sabita Roy and Mr. Arani Das”. 5. Accordingly, in the order dated August 7, 2026 the name of the advocates for the State be read as “Ms. Sabita Roy 2 and Mr. Arani Das” instead of “Mr. Nripendra Pratap Singh”. 6. This order shall be treated as the part of the order dated August 7, 2026. (Krishna Rao, J.)