Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16177-2026 Date of decision: 21.07.2026 RAGHURAJ SINGH ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita, Advocate for Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI. Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.2-Bank. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of the present Civil Writ Petition in order to enable the petitioner to invoke alternative remedy available to him in accordance with law.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI)
JUDGE
(SANJIV BERRY) 21.07.2026 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2026.07.22 19:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.