Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32547 (PNJ)

PRITHAVI SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/8133/2026 · 2026-07-22

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 127 CWP-8133-2026 Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 PRITHAVI SINGH …Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Abhinav Kalia, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 24.09.2025 whereby reference has been forwarded to Court under Section 3H(4) of National Highways Act, 1956. 2. The petitioners’ land situated in Village Rahimpur, Tehsil and District Palwal was acquired for widening NH-334D. The competent authority vide awarded dated 30.05.2025 determined compensation of the acquired land. The competent authority by impugned order has referred the matter to District Court for adjudication of question of apportionment. The reference has been made under Section 3H(4) of National Highways Act, 1956. SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.23 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petition may be disposed of in terms of order dated 15.03.2026 passed by this Court in CR-1224-2026. 4. Learned State counsel expressed his inability to controvert afore-stated factual and legal position. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of in terms of order passed in CR-1224-2026. 6. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 22.07.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.23 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document