IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4549 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Manoj Rai @ Manoj Ray S/o Indradev Ray @ Indradev Rai R/o Village - Madhura Pur, Kalyanpur, P.S - Pipra, District - East Champaran, Pin - 845413 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raju Patel For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 502 of 2025, F.I.R dated 22.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 329(3), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, a land dispute regarding 1 Katha 18 dhur bearing Khata No. 16, Khesra No. 652. It is alleged that when the informant objected to the accused for constructing a house on that land then 12 accused persons formed an unlawful assembly with lathi, fattha, iron rods and farsa and aimed a blow at the informant’s neck, which causes hit his head/forehead and resulted in bleeding and he felt, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4549 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 thereafter co-accused Savitri Devi have snatched cash worth of Rs. 10,000/- and Rs. 500/-. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by referring to the injury report submits that the allegations levelled in the First Information Report does not get corroborated insofar petitioner is concerned because the injury, which have been found to be grievous is not attributable to this petitioner. Whereas, the injury for which the petitioner has been roped in is found simple in nature and the petitioner has clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the petitioner has clean antecedent. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4549 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 502 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. abhishekkr/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T