Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32538 (PNJ)

GAGAN SINGLA v. ICICI BANK LTD AND OTHERS

CWP/14974/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No.14974 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.118 CWP No.14974 of 2026 Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 Gagan Singla .... Petitioner Versus ICICI Bank Ltd. and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Parunjeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Advocate, for respondents no.1 and 2 - ICICI Bank. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents no.1 and 2/ICICI Bank to defreeze/ re-activate the petitioner’s bank account bearing no.08800100618, with its branch at Ludhiana. 2. Learned counsel for the Bank has filed reply dated 18.06.2026, which is retained on the case file. Referring to the same, he submits that the petitioner’s bank account was frozen on instructions of Cyber Crime Police Station, Kerala, received vide communication dated 13.01.2025, Annexure R-1/1, and the same is under lien for an amount of ₹1265. However, his account will now be made operational by maintaining the said lien, within five days. MANINDER 2026.07.23 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP No.14974 of 2026 2 3. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 4. Ordered accordingly. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 22.07.2026 Maninder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANINDER 2026.07.23 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment