Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32535 (PNJ)

BALBIR SINGH v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER

LPA/909/2026 · 2026-07-21

Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

111 BALBIR SINGH PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-2273 days in filing the appeal. supported by a duly sworn affidavit, days in filing the appeal, is condoned. LPA No.909 of 2026 prays for permission to withdraw the present 21-07-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-2273 LPA No.909 of 2026 (O&M Date of Decision : BALBIR SINGH VERSUS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. A.K Walia, Advocate for the HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 2273-LPA-2026 Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of 63 days in filing the appeal. Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the appli supported by a duly sworn affidavit, the same is allowed and the delay of 63 days in filing the appeal, is condoned. LPA No.909 of 2026 (O&M) After arguing for some time, l prays for permission to withdraw the present Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH G Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2273-LPA-2026 in/and LPA No.909 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.07.2026 ........Appellant VERSUS PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL A.K Walia, Advocate for the appellant. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of 63 Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 63 time, learned counsel for the appellant prays for permission to withdraw the present appeal. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE / reasoned: YES PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of 63 cation, the same is allowed and the delay of 63 appellant ) SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.23 13:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document