Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32533 (PNJ)

BALKAR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/21809/2026 · 2026-07-20

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[145] Balkar Singh State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] of a writ in the nature of authorities to execute the warrant of possession ( to order dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P [2] sharers has attained finality with the issuance of 21.05.2026. No appeal or revision has been preferred as per the petitioner against the same. Even though, warrant of possession has been ordered to be issued, the same has not been executed till date. [3] the necessary action will be taken within a period of 04 weeks from today. [4] for the petitioner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21809 Date of Decision : Balkar Singh versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Ms. Komalpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents/revenue authorities to execute the warrant of possession ( to order dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-2). As per the petitioner, the partition proceedings between the co sharers has attained finality with the issuance of 21.05.2026. No appeal or revision has been preferred as per the petitioner against the same. Even though, warrant of possession has been ordered to be issued, the same has not been executed till date. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, assure the necessary action will be taken within a period of 04 weeks from today. The statement made by learned State Counsel satisfies counsel for the petitioner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 21809-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks issuance , directing the respondents/revenue authorities to execute the warrant of possession (Dakhal warrant) pursuant 2). As per the petitioner, the partition proceedings between the co sharers has attained finality with the issuance of Sanad Takseem 21.05.2026. No appeal or revision has been preferred as per the petitioner against the same. Even though, warrant of possession has been ordered to be issued, the same has not been executed till date. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, assures the Court that the necessary action will be taken within a period of 04 weeks from today. The statement made by learned State Counsel satisfies counsel By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks issuance , directing the respondents/revenue ) pursuant As per the petitioner, the partition proceedings between the co- Sanad Takseem on 21.05.2026. No appeal or revision has been preferred as per the petitioner against the same. Even though, warrant of possession has been ordered to be s the Court that the necessary action will be taken within a period of 04 weeks from today. The statement made by learned State Counsel satisfies counsel RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.22 16:23 I agree to specified portions of this document CWP-21809-2026 (O&M) -2- [5] The present writ petition is disposed off in terms of the statement made by learned State Counsel. [6] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 20.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.22 16:23 I agree to specified portions of this document