Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32522 (KAR)

GOPI v. THE MANAGER

MFA/7850/2019 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T. AND SRI NAMAN VANKDARI M., MEMBER MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7850 OF 2019 (MV-I) (LOK-ADALAT NO.2242 OF 2026) BETWEEN: 1. GOPI S/O LATE KUMAR @ SABASTIAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 2. LURD MARY W/O LATE RAMESH PETER AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 3. GLORY W/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT: NO.358 VIVEKANANDA OPP. KSRTC LAYOUT VASANTH GRUHA JP NAGAR 2ND PHASE BANGALORE-78 ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI SHRIPAD V SHASTRI, ADVOCATE & SRI K V NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GE., INS., CO., LTD., NO.121 THE ESTATE 9TH FLOOR DICKENSON ROAD M G ROAD BANGALORE-42 2. MR MADHUSUDAN DHAL Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 S/O ARJUNA DHAL NO.223 RANGANATHA COLONY MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE -26 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B C SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED VIDE ORDER DATED 20.12.2023) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.02.2018 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.6614 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDL. JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER OF MACT, BENGALURU PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its Authorised Officer is filed. The appellants - claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.6,50,000 /- (Rupees Six Lakh Fifty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3 3. The respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks' from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. 5. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed off in terms of the joint memo. The judgment and award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER mn/-